We are in the middle of a mass psychosis. And so it is not surprising that the arguments of those in favour of vaccine passports is just as irrational as all the other Covid measures, such as lockdowns and mask wearing and all the other nonsense over a disease with an almost 100% recovery rate that only affects a small proportion of the population.
Facts don’t matter, evidence doesn’t matter. Actually, that’s not quite right, misinformation and outright lies have quickly turned into supposed facts and evidence, simply through relentless repetition.
A ferocious and perfectly oiled propaganda machine has helped turn Covid from a non-event, something that without the dodgy detection tool that is the PCR test would have gone down in history as perhaps yet another mild to severe flu season, into a human catastrophe – not so much because of the disease itself, but through the measures that were taken: we’ll never know how many people were killed, not by a virus that has still not been properly isolated, but by the wrong treatment, or withheld treatments for other diseases, not to speak of the life years lost through these insane lockdowns.
We are also in the middle of the woke era, where all kinds of discrimination is persecuted with a war-like fervour.
Rather than society changing and evolving naturally towards more inclusion and diversity, say through healthy and open debate, social justice warriors only capable of thinking in black and white roam the real world and cyberspace, stamping out anything they find unpalatable, without any sense for nuance or historical perspective.
Since most companies and governments feel compelled to follow this dictatorial approach, this cancel culture turns a free and democratic (in a loose sense) society into the exact opposite.
And so it is not surprising that these so-called vaccines, thought to be our one and only saviour out of this Covid crisis (at least the politicians and their buddies from the pharma industry see it that way), become a hot potato as well, an issue so divisive it has the real potential to result in some kind of apartheid.
I hear things that make me think of very dark times in human history, the witch hunts, the South African apartheid regime, the Nazi regime. And no, we’re not quite there yet, and I’m not making a direct comparison, but I am warning that the kinds of statements people make about “the unvaccinated”, the labels and descriptions applied to us (eg anti-vaxxers, selfish idiots etc), have all the hallmarks of blatant intolerance and hatred that inevitably leads to discrimination and worse.
But somehow, for all the wokness that abounds in this world, that kind of discrimination seems to be perfectly acceptable. What could be more hypocritical.
The ultimate irony is that the zero-risk-must-save-lives-at-all cost attitude which has made possible this whole sick and sordid obsession with one disease and the ensuing social, economic and health catastrophe, has on the other hand also led to a completely cavalier attitude when it comes to the supposed solutions: mask wearing (hardly healthy at many levels), lockdowns (totally counterproductive with huge ramifications for public health as well), and, of course, vaccines (already a huge number of severe adverse have been recorded – more than for other vaccines over many years).
It’s actually quite a paradox, but somehow that too seems to escape most people. Why? Well, like I said, we’re in a mass psychosis, so reason, rational debate and commonsense have long departed.
And actual discrimination is already looming on the horizon, or has already arrived in some corners of the world. Only the vaccinated are allowed access to indoor dining, cultural events or sights, non-essential shops etc. The unvaccinated are treated as second-class citizens.
And that’s only the beginning, because already there are those who call for much harsher restrictions and punishment for those who won’t have themselves jabbed in the arm with an experimental drug. Some politicians in all earnestness have said the unvaccinated should not be allowed to vote, or should not have access to public services including health services, etc.
And how is this discrimination justified? “The greater good”, “solidarity”, “do your bit for the team”, “it’s patriotic”, “everybody else does – why can’t you?”, “just shut up and do as you’re told”. Hmm, how convincing. I’m reminded of Kohlberg’s moral stages of development. It appears most people never get beyond stage four (obey the law, no matter what).
It’s also clear and not surprising that most people don’t understand vaccination, and have no appreciation of the history of vaccination – for example that in the past various vaccination programs have had to be abandoned because of all too obvious adverse effects.
I’m not blaming people for not knowing, because I’m well aware that any information that is not in support of Covid vaccination is somewhere between ignored and censored by governments and the mainstream media that incessantly peppers the minds of the unsuspecting majority with pro-vaccine propaganda.
So I do understand why people go along with this vaccination operation. If people agree to the procedure and they feel they are fully informed and are doing the right thing, then by all means, it’s consensual, they should be allowed to do so, they roll up their sleeves voluntarily. It’s their life, their body, their choice. I worry about them, but I respect their decision.
Now, what about the arguments of those who oppose Covid vaccination or who at least oppose forced Covid vaccination? You know – those horrible people…
It’s important to point out that there are those who simply oppose any vaccination, for whatever reason, and again, that is their choice. I’ve never counted myself in that group, although I have to say, since I’ve been researching about the history of vaccination, I’m starting to lean that way myself, for most vaccines at least.
I’m probably not the only one who’s taken a closer look at this topic more generally, so the governments by enforcing this Covid needle may well be shooting themselves in the foot and expose their own misguided vaccination policies over the past decades.
However, the vast majority of people opposed to Covid vaccination are not so-called anti-vaxxers, as much as the media would like to portray them in that way.
One of the reasons why people are opposed is that these vaccines on the market are simply not sufficiently tested. Nobody can possibly and credibly claim that they are safe after only a few months. The onus is squarely on the manufacturers and regulatory authorities and governments to prove and make sure that they are safe, that they cause no harm. Is that so difficult to comprehend?
I know that governments, the mainstream media, the medical establishment and of course the manufacturers give assurances, but their words count for very little after 18 months of spreading misinformation and lies. And it stands to reason that these vaccines cannot possibly be deemed safe after only a few months of non-independent and highly deficient studies by the manufacturers.
Where are the independent double blind randomised studies, where are the toxicological studies? They haven’t taken place, because there simply wasn’t any time, and no money can buy the time it takes to assess the safety of these substances. If you take these vaccines, you participate in the largest ever trial of an experimental medical procedure.
And that brings me to the next point. These vaccines currently on the market and available here in Australia are all based on gene-based technology that has never been tried in this way in humans before – and has not been all that successful even in animals.
Why on earth would a government be so irresponsible as to allow some big shot pharma companies to play Russian roulette with the health of an entire population? They must be sleeping together – I can’t explain in any other way why else politicians would allow such recklessness to occur on their watch.
Only the wilfully blind cannot see that there must be a connection between the corrupt politicians that are trying to pull their heads out of the noose they put around their own necks by going along with this whole ridiculous Covid narrative in the first place, and the greedy pharma companies that stand to make billions from this disaster.
Whilst overall the reported damage from Covid vaccines may be low, it is by no means non-existent. Even before Covid it was known that the reporting of vaccine damage is generally poor, the actual figures of injuries estimated to be 10-100x more in reality.
The fact that governments use a funny kind of double standard when it comes to measuring Covid deaths and Covid vaccine deaths, should be another sign that things are not quite right. Add to that the reluctance or refusal by governments to systematically autopsy Covid deaths and Covid vaccine deaths now, and you have yet another reason to be distrustful.
There are also huge question marks around the efficacy of these drugs, but again, you wouldn’t know about it if all you listened to was the mainstream media.
But of course the most important argument is that there is simply no need for any kind of vaccine in the first place. If you can get your head around that argument, we can pick up our lives where we left them at the end of 2019, dust ourselves off, boot out our hopelessly corrupt politicians and their equally corrupt advisers, and get on with our lives, because we all deserve better.
There is no need for a vaccine for a disease with such a low mortality rate for the vast majority of the population – and that’s not even taking into consideration that the mortality figures are without a doubt vastly inflated because of the ridiculous criteria used to attribute deaths to Covid.
And all that nonsense talk about mutant variants and younger people being seriously affected is just more fear porn to get you to roll up your sleeves, and even those of your children. And of course, it’s more justification for the pharma giants to make even more money with booster shots to eternity and beyond. Great business model.
This virus, and the disease (all of the typical symptoms of which are strangely exactly the same symptoms we’ve known from other influenzas), has never been even remotely as dangerous as the plague or the Spanish flu (many question marks about the latter too, once you start digging). Full stop.
And there’s another reason why a vaccine isn’t needed and justifiable. Those unfortunate few who do get seriously sick, allegedly from this virus, can easily be treated. Had the vaccine manufacturers and government officials like the hopelessly corrupt Faucis of this world not done everything in their power to suppress treatment options, far fewer people would have died, allegedly of Covid.
We will never know of course but most of these people probably died because they were simply mistreated by either having tubes stuck down their throats prematurely and unnecessarily (noticed how all those cries for intubation equipment suddenly died down last year?), or given ridiculously high doses of the wrong or the right medication, or no medication, none of which is conducive to recovery no matter the illness.
But this is what happens when a mass psychosis breaks out. Hardly anybody thinks straight any more – even the most intelligent and normally very competent people lose their composure, and if they happen to be in a position of influence or power – well, that’s why we are in the poo now.
On the other hand, those who keep their head screwed on, try to find out what’s actually going on, try to see things in perspective, take a reasoned and rational approach, they are ridiculed, called all sorts of names (but never contradicted by rational and scientific arguments), and censored.
So now that we know that vaccines are a complete waste of time and money and are quite possibly dangerous, in the short and/or the long term, what about the ethical arguments?
Is it ethical for governments and the state to use bribery and coercion against its people to undergo an unnecessary and/or experimental medical procedure? I thought we left that one behind with the Nuremberg code in 1947, after the world said “never again” when it became aware of the horrors of forced medical experiments carried out by Nazi doctors.
With regards to health, the state has to do its best to promote health and keep citizens safe, but also to guarantee their inalienable freedoms and safeguard human rights. This means the least invasive or intrusive path must always be chosen.
Seatbelts and other road rules make sense, they allow everyone the maximum freedom in relative, but not absolute, safety, and we all happily accept some residual risk. The same with regards to indoor smoking bans – if you want to pollute your lungs outside or in your home, that’s entirely your business. The state should respect individuals’ rights to live their own lives and recommend, but never coerce where it is not absolutely necessary.
In the case of Covid, as I’ve argued above, it is not absolutely necessary to foist a vaccine on the population, let alone an experimental one. Besides, governments have done nothing to promote public health over the past 18 months, on the contrary.
The “cures” have been worse than the disease and served to turn the state into increasingly totalitarian structures. Through their nonsensical measures our governments have endangered peoples’ health in many different ways, have taken away the things that make life worth living and keep people healthy (with all the natural risks involved), have locked them up, stuck masks on their faces, treated them in inhumane ways, degraded them, treated them with contempt.
But it’s not just governments that are to blame. It comes down to an absurd and unrealistic expectation and demand for absolute safety by an increasingly risk-averse society.
But is such a society one in which life is worth living? If you say yes, then where would you draw the line? Should the state stop you from doing stupid things such as eat at McDonalds every day or stop you from drinking gallons of sugary drinks every day, or stop your children from using playgrounds forever, or ban skiing, football, flying, anything remotely risky?
Life naturally contains risks, including communicable diseases. We’ve lived with them and accepted them (whilst trying to prevent them) for ever.
There cannot be a duty on the state or a guarantee to protect everybody from every risk in the world. To expect that from the state, or from employers by the way, is plainly absurd.
If people can no longer freely decide what is good for them and to live their lives in freedom to the extent they don’t deliberately interfere with others’ freedom – then we live in a totalitarian state.
People need, and in most cases can and should, take responsibility for their own health. If they need the state’s assistance, they should receive it. But never should they be forced. Society as a whole has no right to force medical treatment on individuals via the power of the state.
So what should our governments have done, facing the threat of an incredibly deadly virus even though it turned out to be not that incredibly deadly at all?
It wasn’t actually that difficult. They should have simply stuck to their original pandemic plans, plans which no doubt cost many millions of taxpayer dollars to create and perfect over many years.
None of these plans contained any of the nonsensical measures like lockdowns and generalised mask wearing. It’s not too late, governments could still do this, but of course they would have to admit that their approach so far has been fundamentally flawed at so many levels – so I’m not getting my hopes up.
Governments could also be reasonably expected to coordinate efforts to promote healthy living, for example. All diseases are less of a problem for those who are fit and lead a healthy lifestyle.
In 18 months I’ve not heard any governments give any recommendations on how to boost one’s immune system through healthy living and known cheap measures such as exercise, balanced diet, vitamin supplementation where necessary.
But of course, there is no money to be made for big pharma through such measures. So, unsurprisingly, clearly the vaccine was always the only option.
Our governments have the gall to tell us to our faces “vaccines won’t be mandatory”, only to turn around and make it mandatory for certain groups of professions, one by one, and then introducing mandates through the back door, generally referred to as vaccine passports, and expect private businesses to do their dirty enforcement work. Of course businesses want to survive, so they go along with this, not realising they are being instrumentalised. And with almost the entire population in a state of fear and panic, anything goes.
Governments tell us you can refuse the jab, but if you want to live a full and free life and participate in society, you have to take the jab, the choice is wide open. Businesses are increasingly starting to do the same, towards their employees and their customers.
This kind of behaviour between humans would be called blackmail, coercion, abuse, discrimination, it would be frowned upon, and rightly so – it is despicable behaviour. Why is this same behaviour condoned and celebrated when the state does it now, when businesses do it to their employees and their customers? Would those in favour treat their spouses like that, their friends, their family, their children?
Those who want to take the jab should go and get it. Those who don’t, should have the right to say “no”.
Where positions are irreconcilable as they seem to be in regards to Covid, perhaps the best we can do as humans is to have mutual respect for each other and our respective positions.
Ultimately nobody knows anything for certain, nobody can prove anything for sure. We all act in accordance with what we know or what we think we know, and what makes sense to us.
If you have your jab you don’t hurt me, if I don’t have mine, I don’t hurt you, because you’ve had yours, right? Let’s just see how we go, and if after ten years, those horrible unvaccinated die out because of Covid, well then, the vaccinated were right and they can go dance on the graves of the unvaccinated and celebrate.
I have a feeling though that those judging this era of mass psychosis many years from now will judge our decision-makers rather harshly, and perhaps even more harshly those who knew but didn’t speak up…
In this case, I would rather die knowing I have made my own choice after making my own independent judgement on the situation based on my own rational thinking after carefully weighing up the evidence as best I can.
The most common reason for people getting vaccinated, at least that is what I gather from my immediate circle of friends and family, seems to be not the conviction that this is an absolutely necessary procedure, but they are simply driven or compelled by the desire to return back to a normal life, to get back the promised freedoms, freedoms that the governments have unjustifiably denied us in the first place.
How absurd that we should be doing things against our will to get back something that the state never had a right to take away from us.
But even if every single human was Covid vaccinated, why would the big beneficiaries, the big pharma companies and the big tech companies stop there? Why would they want to go back to normal? Why would the politicians want this to end? Together they have the entire population in their pocket, one way or another, and they know it. And they didn’t even have to use physical violence.
I’m only hoping that eventually enough people will see through the deception and the lies and realise their own impending enslavement, and finally rise up against the global technocratic totalitarian regime that is sneaking up on us behind this Covid smokescreen.
We don’t need a “Great Reset”, we need a great … awakening!
